Aethon TUGvsBear Robotics Servi

For large teaching hospitals (200+ beds) routing medications, linens, and lab specimens 24/7 to reduce manual delivery workload, TUG is easier to deploy today — Servi is the longer bet on capability.

Aethon TUG
Aethon
TUG
$105K–$105K
Bear Robotics Servi
Bear Robotics
Servi
$16K–$16K
TUG
2 wins
vs
Servi
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

TUG
  • 95
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 34
    Price accessibility
    84
  • 90
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

TUG
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    72
  • 453.6 kg (1,000 lbs for TUG T3)
    Payload
    66 lb (standard Servi); 88 lb (Servi Plus)
  • 1 m/s (3.6 km/h)
    Speed
    0.1 to 1.2 m/s
  • 24 hours intermittent charging
    Battery
    8–12 hours average; 4–5 hours full recharge; quick charge 1–2 hours for 4–6 hours runtime

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 90
    Environment fit
    85
  • 75
    Future potential
    80
  • 1,160 × 570 × 1,220 mm (length × width × height)
    Footprint
    Standard Servi: 445 × 430 × 1,046 mm (17.5" × 17" × 41"); Servi Plus: 533 × 584 × 1,219 mm (21" × 23" × 48")
TUG · Best for

Large teaching hospitals (200+ beds) routing medications, linens, and lab specimens 24/7 to reduce manual delivery workload

Servi · Best for

High-volume casual dining: Taiwan Red Lantern restaurant uses 9 robots, achieving 1,173 daily deliveries and 60,302 meters moved.

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose TUG. If the goal is to be ready when Servi's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonTUGServi

More head-to-head