Aethon TUGvsMiR MiR1350

Aethon TUG leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

Aethon TUG
Aethon
TUG
$105K–$105K
MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
TUG
3 wins
vs
MiR1350
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

TUG
  • 95
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

TUG
  • 34
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 90
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 453.6 kg (1,000 lbs for TUG T3)
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • 1 m/s (3.6 km/h)
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • 24 hours intermittent charging
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

TUG
  • 90
    Environment fit
    75
  • 75
    Future potential
    68
  • 1,160 × 570 × 1,220 mm (length × width × height)
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
TUG · Best for

Large teaching hospitals (200+ beds) routing medications, linens, and lab specimens 24/7 to reduce manual delivery workload

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose TUG. If the goal is to be ready when MiR1350's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonTUGMiR1350

More head-to-head