Aethon TUGvsMiR MiR250

Aethon TUG leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

Aethon TUG
Aethon
TUG
$105K–$105K
MiR MiR250
MiR
MiR250
$50K–$70K
TUG
2 wins
vs
MiR250
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 95
    Deployment readiness
    95
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 34
    Price accessibility
    56
  • 90
    ROI clarity
    80

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

TUG
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    75
  • 453.6 kg (1,000 lbs for TUG T3)
    Payload
    250 kg
  • 1 m/s (3.6 km/h)
    Speed
    2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)
  • 24 hours intermittent charging
    Battery
    10 hours

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

TUG
  • 90
    Environment fit
    78
  • 75
    Future potential
    70
  • 1,160 × 570 × 1,220 mm (length × width × height)
    Footprint
    800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)
TUG · Best for

Large teaching hospitals (200+ beds) routing medications, linens, and lab specimens 24/7 to reduce manual delivery workload

MiR250 · Best for

Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

Open interactive comparisonTUGMiR250

More head-to-head