FANUC CRX-10iAvsKeenon DinerBot T5

Close call. CRX-10iA and DinerBot T5 trade wins across the matrix.

CRX-10iA
2 wins
vs
DinerBot T5
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

CRX-10iA
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    82
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 61
    Price accessibility
    89
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    76

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

CRX-10iA
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    79
  • 10 kg
    Payload
    40 kg (88 lbs)
  • Max joint speeds: J1–J2 360°/s, J3 540°/s, J4–J6 380°/s; operational speeds 120–180°/s across joints
    Speed
    Max walking speed 1 m/s
  • N/A – mains-powered (100–240V AC)
    Battery
    4-hour charging time; DC 48V 12Ah battery

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 85
    Environment fit
    85
  • 72
    Future potential
    72
  • Robot arm width ~245 mm; teach pendant 335 × 176 × 120 mm
    Footprint
    507 mm W × 502 mm D × 1,204 mm H
CRX-10iA · Best for

CNC machine tending — load/unload parts from spindles in 5–50-second cycles

DinerBot T5 · Best for

100-seat hotpot restaurant during dinner rush (18:00–21:00); robot handles 60–80% of tray movements, freeing 2 servers for order accuracy and table check-backs.

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose CRX-10iA. If the goal is to be ready when DinerBot T5's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head