Hello Robot Stretch 4vstemi temi V3

For teleheath check-ins for elderly or at-risk residents — robot delivers video call interface autonomously to patient rooms, temi V3 is easier to deploy today — Stretch 4 is the longer bet on capability.

Stretch 4
2 wins
vs
temi V3
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

temi V3
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    80
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

temi V3
  • 72
    Price accessibility
    95
  • 58
    ROI clarity
    70

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Stretch 4
  • 45
    Labor replacement
    55
  • 2.5 kg (arm extended); 4 kg (arm retracted)
    Payload
    3 kg
  • 60 cm/s (top speed)
    Speed
    1 m/s
  • Up to eight hours of runtime
    Battery
    8 hours

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Stretch 4
  • 85
    Environment fit
    75
  • 78
    Future potential
    70
  • 45 cm diameter base; 160 cm height
    Footprint
    350 × 450 × 1000 mm (W × D × H)
Stretch 4 · Best for

Assistive feeding, hygiene support, and fetching items for individuals with quadriplegia or severe mobility impairments

temi V3 · Best for

Teleheath check-ins for elderly or at-risk residents — robot delivers video call interface autonomously to patient rooms

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose temi V3. If the goal is to be ready when Stretch 4's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head