Keenon T10vsPudu Robotics KettyBot Pro
Close call. T10 and KettyBot Pro trade wins across the matrix.
T10
2 wins
KettyBot Pro
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness85
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 82Price accessibility88
- 78ROI clarity78
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement72
- 40 kg (10 kg per tray across 4 layers)Payload10 kg per layer (22 pounds per layer)
- 0.1–1.0 m/s adjustable; 0.8 m/s at full load on dry roadSpeed1.2 m/s maximum cruise speed
- 6 hours nominal; up to 10 hours under optimal conditionsBattery9 hours (no-load operation)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 82Environment fit82
- 76Future potential70
- 486 × 555 × 1,399 mm (W × D × H)Footprint435 × 450 × 1120 mm (W × D × H)
T10 · Best for
200+ seat hotpot or casual dining chains during peak dinner service (one robot per 4–5 tables)
KettyBot Pro · Best for
200–300 seat full-service restaurant dinner rush — single robot reduces food-runner headcount by 1–2 FTE, 9-hour battery covers evening service.
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.