MiR MiR600vspudu t300

MiR MiR600 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

MiR MiR600
MiR
MiR600
$99K–$99K
pudu t300
pudu
t300
$22K–$26K
MiR600
3 wins
vs
t300
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR600
  • 92
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 36
    Price accessibility
    76
  • 88
    ROI clarity
    72

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR600
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 600 kg
    Payload
    300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
  • 2.0 m/s (7.2 km/h)
    Speed
    Maximum 1.2 m/s
  • up to 8 hours 30 minutes at max payload; up to 11 hours with no payload
    Battery
    12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

MiR600
  • 90
    Environment fit
    80
  • 75
    Future potential
    70
  • 1,350 × 910 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
MiR600 · Best for

Medium-to-heavy pallet transport in automotive assembly plants (replacing 2–3 forklift shifts)

t300 · Best for

Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR600. If the goal is to be ready when t300's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonMiR600t300

More head-to-head