MiR MiR1350vsOmron Robotics MD 650

Close call. MiR1350 and MD 650 trade wins across the matrix.

MiR1350
1 wins
vs
MD 650
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    92
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR1350
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    30
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MD 650
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    650 kg
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    2.2 m/s
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    8 hours (5% to 95% charging in <30 minutes)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

MD 650
  • 75
    Environment fit
    82
  • 68
    Future potential
    71
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    Width 944 mm x Length 1194 mm x Height 320 mm; Vehicle Weight 249 kg
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

MD 650 · Best for

Inter-warehouse pallet staging: 8-hour shifts moving loaded EUR/US pallets between receiving, storage, and packing lines without conveyor infrastructure.

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head