MiR MiR250vsMiR MiR600
MiR MiR600 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
MiR250
0 wins
MiR600
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 95Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 56Price accessibility36
- 80ROI clarity88
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 75Labor replacement85
- 250 kgPayload600 kg
- 2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)Speed2.0 m/s (7.2 km/h)
- 10 hoursBatteryup to 8 hours 30 minutes at max payload; up to 11 hours with no payload
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit90
- 70Future potential75
- 800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)Footprint1,350 × 910 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
MiR250 · Best for
Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).
MiR600 · Best for
Medium-to-heavy pallet transport in automotive assembly plants (replacing 2–3 forklift shifts)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

